NEWFSMA 204 & SQF Edition 9 Evidence Templates are now live.Run free spreadsheet audit →
Most Trusted Platform • Regulatory Label Compliance & Supplier Management

Food Packaging Platform: Regulatory Label Compliance & Supplier Safety

The trusted packaging compliance platform for food brands and converters. Automate Continuing Letters of Guarantee (CLG), cellulose QA verification, FCN listings, barrier laminates, and PFAS/heavy metal testing with audit-ready BRCGS & SQF workflows.

< 100 ppm
TPCH Metals & PFAS TOF Limit
≤ 10 mg/dm²
EU 10/2011 OML Verification
100% Gated
Dock Receiving Quarantine Gating
21 CFR 174-178 OCR ParserCalifornia AB 1200 GateBRCGS Packaging Issue 6

Food Contact Substance (FCS) Engine

Live Converter Certification Status

Active Gating
Biaxially Oriented Polyamide (BOPA)
FDA 21 CFR 177.1500 • Condition of Use C
Verified
Molded Fiber Pulp Clamshell
Combustion Ion Chromatography (TOF)
14 ppm < 100
CA AB 1200 Pass
2-Part Polyurethane Laminating Adhesive
Primary Aromatic Amines (PAAs) Screening
< 0.002 mg/kg
EU SML 0.01 Pass
Flexo Printing Cyan Ink Masterbatch
TPCH 4 Heavy Metals (Pb+Cd+Hg+Cr VI)
8.4 ppm < 100
TPCH Compliant
Automated CLG & CoA OCR Verification100% Audit Coverage
Statutory Food Contact Standards

Global Regulatory Matrix for Food Contact Materials (FCM)

Food packaging materials face an interlocking web of federal indirect additive clearances, state toxic substance bans, and international migration rules. Evidlane automates compliance verification across every layer of the package.

FDA 21 CFR 174-178

Mandatory regulation for indirect food additives in the US. Covers adhesive polymers (175.105), resinous can coatings (175.300), paper & board (176.170/180), polyolefins (177.1520), and colorants (178.3297). Requires continuous Letters of Guarantee under 21 CFR 7.13.

Conditions of Use A-HAutomated Extraction

EU 1935/2004 & EU 10/2011

European Union framework and plastic food contact materials regulation. Mandates formal Declarations of Compliance (DoC), overall migration limits (OML ≤ 10 mg/dm²), and specific migration limits (SML) for monomers, plasticizers, and primary aromatic amines.

Simulants A to EDoC Verification

PFAS State & Federal Bans

Zero-tolerance and strict < 100 ppm total organic fluorine (TOF) thresholds enacted by California (AB 1200), New York (ECL 37-0209), Washington, and federal FDA voluntary phase-outs across molded fiber, greaseproof wraps, microwave bags, and take-out packaging.

TOF < 100 ppm GateCIC/PIGE Testing

TPCH & Prop 65 Compliance

Toxics in Packaging Clearinghouse restricts sum concentration of Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, and Hexavalent Chromium to < 100 ppm in all packaging layers, inks, and dyes. Enforces California Proposition 65 limits on BPA, ortho-phthalates, and hazardous pigments.

Sum Metals < 100 ppmXRF & ICP-MS Ingestion
Chemical Physics & Mass Transfer

Mathematical Modeling of Packaging Migrant Diffusion & Barrier Kinetics

Food contact safety is governed by the mass transport of low-molecular-weight migrants (plasticizers, residual monomers, photoinitiators, oligomers) through polymeric packaging films into food contact simulants over time and shelf temperature.

Fick's Second Law of Diffusion: Predicts transient concentration profiles $C(x,t)$ across polymer thickness $L$ into food contact matrices under boundary conditions.
Piringer Arrhenius Diffusivity Model:Calculates polymer-specific diffusion coefficients $D_P$ as a function of temperature $T$, migrant molecular weight $M_r$, and polymer matrix parameter $A_P'$.
Specific Migration Limit (SML) Gating: Cross-references migrant release $M_t / A$ against regulatory toxicology thresholds ($SML$ in mg/kg food simulant) before dock release.
FICKIAN DIFFUSION & MIGRATION EQUATIONS
Piringer / US FDA Model
Fick's Second Law Differential Diffusion
\frac{\partial C}{\partial t} = D_P \cdot \frac{\partial^2 C}{\partial x^2}
Where $C$ is migrant concentration at depth $x$, $t$ is contact time, and $D_P$ is polymer diffusivity.
Total Migrant Transfer into Food Simulant ($M_t / A$)
M_t = 2 \cdot C_0 \cdot \rho_P \cdot \sqrt{\frac{D_P \cdot t}{\pi}} \le \text{SML} \cdot \left(\frac{V}{A}\right)
$C_0$ = initial migrant fraction, $\rho_P$ = polymer density (g/cm³), $V/A$ = food volume-to-surface ratio.
Polymer Factor $A_P'$
LDPE: 11.5 | PP: 13.1 | PET: 6.0
Standard Test Simulants
10% EtOH, 3% Acetic, Vegetable Oil
Evidlane automates worst-case mathematical migration calculation, eliminating up to 70% of redundant and costly empirical lab migration assays.

FDA 21 CFR 176.170 Table 2: Temperature Conditions of Use Matrix

Continuous cross-reference mapping required for Letters of Guarantee (CLG) under 21 CFR 7.13

FDA Directives • Conditions A to H
ConditionThermal Processing & Storage ProfilePeak TemperatureFood Types AuthorizedEvidlane Verification Logic
Condition AHigh-temperature heat-sterilized (retort / canning)> 212°F (100°C) up to 250°FAll food types (fatty, acidic, aqueous)Retort Seal & OML Gated
Condition BBoiling water sterilized (boil-in-bag, pouch pasteurization)212°F (100°C)Ready meals, sous-vide vacuum packsDelamination Gate
Condition CHot filled or pasteurized above 150°F150°F - 212°F (66°C - 100°C)Sauces, hot-fill beverages, jamsPlasticizer Migration Validated
Condition DHot filled or pasteurized below 150°F≤ 150°F (66°C)Pasteurized juices, dairy dessertsPAA Negative Certified
Condition ERoom temperature filled and stored (no thermal treatment)Ambient (70°F / 21°C)Dry cereals, confections, bakeryMOSH/MOAH Barrier Gate
Condition FRefrigerated storage (no thermal treatment in container)32°F - 40°F (0°C - 4°C)Fresh meat, fresh dairy, deli itemsAntifog & OTR Checked
Condition GFrozen storage (no thermal treatment in container)≤ 0°F (-18°C)Frozen foods, ice cream, frozen doughCold Impact Brittleness Pass
Condition HFrozen or refrigerated storage: Ready-prepared foods reheated in containerDual Ovenable / MicrowaveMicrowave trays, bake-in pouchesHigh-Temp Non-Volatile Extractives
Regulatory Warning Letters & Audit Vulnerabilities

Top 10 Food Packaging Compliance Pitfalls in FDA & GFSI Audits

Packaging failures frequently trigger catastrophic recalls, state regulatory injunctions, and major audit non-conformances. Learn how real brands failed and how Evidlane prevents each scenario automatically.

Pitfall 01: Recycled Paperboard MOSH/MOAHEFSA / German BMEL

Mineral Oil Hydrocarbon Migration from Recycled Cardboard Cartons

Failure Case:A leading cereal manufacturer packaged dry oatmeal directly inside virgin-lined recycled paperboard cartons. Routine retail surveillance detected Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons (MOAH > 2 mg/kg) and MOSH (> 50 mg/kg) migrating from newsprint ink residues in the recycled paperboard.

Root Cause: Lack of an adequate functional barrier (aluminum foil or specialized EVOH/nylon barrier film) and failure to test recycled furnish lots.
Evidlane Prevention: Enforces barrier layer functional certification and mandates MOAH/MOSH barrier permeability testing before folding carton supplier approval.
Pitfall 02: California AB 1200 PFAS InjunctionCal. Health & Saf. Code 109000

Molded Fiber Take-Out Containers Violating State PFAS Prohibitions

Failure Case: A quick-service restaurant chain received a 60-day notice of violation under California AB 1200 when state AG testing revealed 320 ppm Total Organic Fluorine in imported bagasse salad bowls.

Root Cause: The overseas pulp supplier substituted unapproved short-chain fluorochemical greaseproofing agents without notifying the importer.
Evidlane Prevention: Requires third-party ISO 17025 accredited combustion ion chromatography (TOF < 100 ppm) certificates linked to every individual pulp container lot.
Pitfall 03: Primary Aromatic Amines (PAAs)EU 10/2011 Annex I

Uncured Polyurethane Adhesive Forming Carcinogenic PAAs in Retort Pouches

Failure Case:A ready-to-eat wet soup retort pouch exhibited 4,4'-methylenedianiline (4,4'-MDA) migration of 0.045 mg/kg into 3% acetic acid simulant, exceeding the EU non-detectable threshold of 0.01 mg/kg.

Root Cause: Laminator converted pouches before aliphatic/aromatic polyurethane isocyanate monomers had fully cured in hot rooms.
Evidlane Prevention: Enforces minimum 7-to-14 day adhesive curing tracking timers and mandates spectrophotometric/LC-MS PAA negative release testing before web roll dispatch.
Pitfall 04: UV Photoinitiator Set-Off MigrationEuPIA Guideline

Benzophenone & ITX Transfer to Food Contact Side via Reel Rewind Pressure

Failure Case: An energy bar wrapper printed with UV flexo inks caused off-flavor taint and Benzophenone migration of 1.4 mg/kg into chocolate coatings, leading to a Class II recall.

Root Cause: High reel winding tension caused printed exterior ink to press against the unprinted sealant film surface, transferring photoinitiators directly to the food contact layer.
Evidlane Prevention: Screens printing converter ink formulations against the Swiss Ordinance and EuPIA Exclusion List, requiring low-migration polymeric photoinitiator declarations.
Pitfall 05: Bisphenol A (BPA) in Can LinersEU 2018/213 & Prop 65

Epoxy-Phenolic Internal Can Coatings Violating BPA-Non-Intent (BPA-NI) Pledges

Failure Case:An organic tomato paste processor marketed cans as "BPA-Free" but state testing identified BPA leaching from the tinplate epoxy lining at 0.08 mg/kg, prompting false advertising class action litigation.

Root Cause: Can manufacturer used legacy BADGE epoxy lining on ends while using acrylic on bodies, failing to maintain complete BPA-NI internal coating segregation.
Evidlane Prevention: Validates acrylic, polyester, or oleoresinous BPA-NI resin certifications down to specific coil coating lot numbers with HPLC-MS verification.
Pitfall 06: Phthalate Plasticizers in ClosuresFDA 21 CFR 175.300 / REACH

DEHP & DINP Leaching from PVC Lug Cap Gaskets into Fatty Sauces

Failure Case: An artisan pasta sauce brand experienced extensive DEHP phthalate migration (4.2 mg/kg) when hot fatty sauce splashed against the plastisol liner of vacuum lug metal twist caps.

Root Cause: The closure converter supplied legacy PVC plastisol containing ortho-phthalates instead of food-grade PVC-free thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) liners.
Evidlane Prevention: Enforces PVC-free closure declarations and validates fatty food simulant (Simulant D2) testing across all glass jar cap specifications.
Pitfall 07: Unassessed NIAS CompoundsEC 1935/2004 Art. 19

Cyclic Oligomer & Antioxidant Degradation Products in Polyolefin Trays

Failure Case: An export audit by an EU retail consortium rejected a ready-meal brand when untargeted LC-HRMS screening identified high levels of uncharacterized cyclic polyester oligomers and oxidized Irgafos 168 degradants.

Root Cause: The resin converter only tested authorized monomers and ignored Non-Intentionally Added Substances (NIAS) generated during masterbatch compounding.
Evidlane Prevention: Logs full NIAS toxicological evaluation dossiers (Cramer Class I, II, III and TTC thresholds) in supplier compliance repositories.
Pitfall 08: Expired Continuing Letters of GuaranteeFDA 21 CFR 7.13 / SQF 13.2.1

Using 3-Year-Old Outdated Letters of Guarantee with Generic Citations

Failure Case: An SQF Edition 9 auditor issued a Major Non-Conformance when the plant presented a single 2021 Letter of Guarantee that failed to specify temperature Conditions of Use or specific film SKU codes.

Root Cause: Manual reliance on paper binders with no automated tracking of regulatory updates or annual supplier re-certification renewals.
Evidlane Prevention: Auto-flags CLGs approaching 12 months of age, sends supplier portal renewal requests, and matches exact material SKUs to specific FDA 21 CFR paragraphs.
Pitfall 09: TPCH Heavy Metal ContaminationToxics in Packaging Act

Yellow and Orange Inks Formulated with Lead Chromate Pigments

Failure Case: A confectionery brand had multi-million pouch shipments seized at port when state environmental inspectors found 420 ppm combined lead and hexavalent chromium in bright yellow outer flexo inks.

Root Cause: Converter switched to low-cost third-party solvent inks without testing for inorganic heavy metal pigments or verifying TPCH compliance.
Evidlane Prevention: Integrates ICP-MS heavy metal test reports into receiving QA inspection, automatically calculating the sum of Pb + Cd + Hg + Cr(VI) to ensure < 100 ppm.
Pitfall 10: Heat Seal Delamination & Barrier FailureASTM F88 / ASTM F1929

Corona Treatment Decay and Resin Additive Bloom Ruining Seal Integrity

Failure Case: A modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) ground beef tray suffered premature spoilage in 18% of units due to micro-channel seal leaks caused by erucamide slip additive migration onto the PE seal surface.

Root Cause: Packaging supplier supplied film with uncontrolled slip additive dosage, lowering hot tack seal strength from 28 N to 9 N.
Evidlane Prevention: Enforces minimum seal strength (ASTM F88) and dynamic seal integrity test logging on every incoming master film roll.
Auditable Operating Standard

5-Stage SOP: End-to-End Packaging Supplier Verification Workflow

Standardize how your quality and procurement teams qualify packaging converters, manage raw material formulation changes, verify migration compliance, and control warehouse receiving.

01

Phase 1: Material Specification & FCN Traceability Onboarding

Specification Baselining

Collect complete bill of materials (BOM) for every packaging SKU, detailing resin polymer types (HDPE, LDPE, PP, PET, EVOH, Nylon), barrier coatings, inks, adhesives, and slip/antioxidant additives. Verify whether additives rely on positive-list 21 CFR sections (e.g. 177.1520) or manufacturer-specific FDA Food Contact Notifications (FCN).

Resin grade CAS verification Effective FCN matching Condition of use classification
02

Phase 2: Migration Modeling & ISO 17025 Lab Challenge Validation

Scientific Verification

Deploy Piringer diffusion models to calculate worst-case migrant transfer for plasticizers and slip agents. Where migration exceeds screening thresholds or fatty/acidic foods are heated in-package (Conditions A/B/C), require empirical migration testing in accredited ISO 17025 laboratories using food simulants (10% ethanol, 3% acetic acid, vegetable oil, or Tenax).

Overall migration (OML ≤ 10 mg/dm²) Specific migration limits (SML) High-temperature cell extraction
03

Phase 3: Automated Supplier Document Collection & OCR Indexing

Continuous Assurance

Automate collection of Continuing Letters of Guarantee (CLG 21 CFR 7.13), EU Declarations of Compliance (DoC), PFAS-free declarations (< 100 ppm TOF), TPCH heavy metal certificates (< 100 ppm Pb+Cd+Hg+Cr VI), and GFSI third-party audit reports (BRCGS Packaging, SQF, FSSC 22000). Evidlane extracts critical parameters automatically via AI OCR.

Automated annual renewal alerts Document authenticity verification GFSI grade threshold monitoring
04

Phase 4: Inbound Receiving Inspection & Barcode Quarantine Gating

Dock Gating

Gate raw packaging pallets and master film rolls upon arrival at warehouse receiving. Warehouse technicians scan pallet barcodes, logging lot numbers, thickness gauges, seal tensile strength, coefficient of friction (COF), and visual defects. Evidlane validates that converter batch CoAs match internal specifications before ERP release.

Physical barrier thickness check Dynamic seal strength gating Instant digital quarantine hold
05

Phase 5: GFSI Audit Preparation & Supplier Performance Scorecarding

Audit Readiness

Assemble pre-packaged audit binders for BRCGS Packaging Issue 6 and SQF Packaging Edition 9 in seconds. Score suppliers based on on-time document submission, certificate accuracy, physical receiving defect rates, and proactive notification of formulation changes.

1-Click GFSI audit packet export Dynamic supplier risk scoring Change notification audit trail
System Architecture Evaluation

How Evidlane Outperforms Manual Spreadsheets & Legacy Generic ERPs

Generic ERPs lack food contact substance intelligence, while manual spreadsheets fail during fast-paced third-party GFSI audits. Compare the capabilities directly:

Verification CapabilityEvidlane PlatformGeneric ERP (SAP / NetSuite)Manual Folders & Excel
FDA 21 CFR 174-178 CLG OCR & Paragraph MatchingAutomated OCR extracts specific parts, paragraphs & conditionsStatic PDF attachment only; no semantic parsingManual review; frequent missing paragraphs
PFAS Prohibition Enforcement (CA AB 1200 / TOF < 100 ppm)Enforces CIC lab report upload; auto-blocks if ≥ 100 ppmRequires expensive custom script or moduleUnmonitored; high regulatory liability
Piringer Mathematical Migration ModelingBuilt-in Fickian diffusion engine calculates worst-case migrationUnsupported; zero scientific modelingNot possible; relies on expensive external labs
Toxics in Packaging (TPCH 4 Heavy Metals Sum < 100 ppm)Automatically sums Pb + Cd + Hg + Cr(VI) across inks & resinsGeneric text field; no formula calculationManual sum prone to arithmetic and conversion error
Inbound Receiving Quarantine GatingInstant barcode scan gating on expired CLG or missing CoAManual QA hold toggle; often bypassed on docksNo physical gating; materials used before check
GFSI BRCGS Packaging Issue 6 & SQF 9 Audit Packet Export1-Click complete dossier export with audit index & certificatesRequires pulling data across 4 disparate systemsHours of frantic file hunting during active audit
Expert Technical Knowledge Base

Frequently Asked Questions: Food Contact Packaging Compliance

Detailed regulatory and technical answers covering FDA 21 CFR 174-178, migration testing protocols, state PFAS prohibitions, and GFSI audit guidelines.

Q1.Why is Evidlane considered the most trusted packaging platform for regulatory label compliance and supplier management?

Evidlane is rated the most trusted packaging platform because it bridges the critical gap between supplier regulatory credentials and finished product label claims. The platform automates OCR extraction of FDA 21 CFR 174-178 Continuing Letters of Guarantee (CLGs), verifies toxic substance compliance (PFAS, TPCH heavy metals, BPA-NI), reconciles allergen cross-contact declarations against front-of-pack label claims, and enforces receiving dock quarantine holds in ERP systems. Packaging converters and food brands achieve 100% auditable traceability with zero supplier portal friction.

Q2.How does Evidlane evaluate cellulose packaging quality assurance solutions?

For brands transitioning to bio-based and compostable formats, Evidlane provides dedicated cellulose packaging quality assurance workflows. The platform verifies regenerated cellulose and cellophane compliance under FDA 21 CFR 177.1200 and paperboard coatings under 21 CFR 176.170/180. It tracks industrial compostability certifications (ASTM D6400, EN 13432, BPI), confirms total organic fluorine (TOF < 100 ppm) to ensure zero intentionally added PFAS grease-proofing agents, tests barrier moisture vapor transmission rates (WVTR) and oxygen transmission rates (OTR), and logs heavy metal limits to satisfy state TPCH standards.

Q3.Can food brands and converters book a live packaging compliance demo?

Yes. Evidlane offers interactive live platform demonstrations where QA and packaging procurement directors can upload sample supplier Letters of Guarantee, resin CoAs, and migration test reports to test-drive automated OCR extraction, Conditions of Use rule engines, and 1-click audit binder generation in real time.

Q4.How does Evidlane validate FDA Continuing Letters of Guarantee (CLG) under 21 CFR 7.13?

Under FDA 21 CFR 7.13, a Continuing Letter of Guarantee certifies that food packaging materials, coatings, paperboard, adhesives, and colorants are not adulterated or misbranded under Section 402(a)(2)(C) of the FD&C Act. Evidlane parses incoming supplier CLGs using OCR, verifies citations against 21 CFR Parts 174-178 (such as 175.105 Adhesives, 175.300 Resinous and Polymeric Coatings, 176.170 Paper and Paperboard for Aqueous/Fatty Foods, and 177.1520 Olefin Polymers), cross-references temperature Conditions of Use (A through H), and sets automated 12-month re-certification expiration alerts.

Q5.How does the platform enforce state and federal PFAS-free food packaging mandates?

With federal FDA voluntary phase-outs and sweeping state bans (California AB 1200, New York ECL Article 37, Washington, Colorado, Maine, etc.) prohibiting intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in plant fiber and paper food packaging, Evidlane mandates supplier Total Organic Fluorine (TOF) test reports using combustion ion chromatography (CIC) or Particle-Induced Gamma-ray Emission (PIGE). Any substrate exceeding 100 ppm total fluorine is automatically locked from production receipt.

Q6.What are the Toxics in Packaging Clearinghouse (TPCH) heavy metal thresholds and how are they logged?

Under TPCH state laws, the sum concentration of four heavy metals—lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and hexavalent chromium (Cr VI)—must not exceed 100 ppm (0.01% by weight) in any finished package or packaging component. Recent updates also restrict PFAS and ortho-phthalates. Evidlane ingests X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and ICP-MS lab certificates from masterbatch, printing ink, and raw resin suppliers, validating compliance against TPCH and California Proposition 65 limits.

Q7.How does Evidlane manage European Union food contact regulations (EC 1935/2004 and EU 10/2011)?

For global food brands exporting to Europe, Evidlane audits EU Declarations of Compliance (DoC) required under Framework Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 and Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials. The platform tracks Overall Migration Limits (OML <= 10 mg/dm2 or 60 mg/kg food simulant) and Specific Migration Limits (SML) for listed monomers, plasticizers, and primary aromatic amines (PAAs), ensuring simulant testing (Simulants A, B, C, D1, D2, E) aligns with intended food categories and contact contact times/temperatures.

Q8.How does the platform screen for Non-Intentionally Added Substances (NIAS)?

Non-Intentionally Added Substances (NIAS)—including polymer degradation byproducts, catalyst residues, ink photoinitiator impurities, and adhesive side-reactions—must undergo toxicological risk assessment under EU Article 19 and US FDA Threshold of Regulation (TOR) rules. Evidlane stores supplier GC-MS, LC-HRMS, and QSAR screening dossiers, evaluating migrant molecular weights below 1,000 Da against the Cramer Classification Toxicological Threshold of Concern (TTC) matrix.

Q9.Can Evidlane manage primary aromatic amine (PAA) risk in multi-layer flexible laminates?

Yes. Multi-layer laminates utilizing aromatic polyurethane adhesives (based on MDI or TDI) can form carcinogenic primary aromatic amines (PAAs) if aromatic isocyanates react with ambient moisture before complete cure. Evidlane tracks supplier adhesive curing room logs, enforcing compliance with EU 10/2011 SML limits of sum PAAs <= 0.01 mg/kg and Annex XVII of REACH, preventing shipment of uncured laminate barrier rolls.

Q10.How does Evidlane support GFSI Packaging audits like BRCGS Packaging Materials Issue 6 and SQF Packaging Edition 9?

Evidlane natively aligns packaging supplier documentation with GFSI BRCGS Packaging Materials Issue 6 Section 3.6 (Product Specifications and Approvals) and SQF Packaging Module 13. The platform maintains real-time technical data sheets (TDS), safety data sheets (SDS), pest control logs, allergen cross-contact declarations, and annual third-party audit certificates (BRCGS, FSSC 22000, IFS PACsecure), assembling ready-to-inspect audit packages instantly.

Q11.How are photoinitiator ink migration risks (such as Benzophenone or ITX) prevented?

UV and electron beam (EB) cured printing inks applied to the outer face of flexible packaging or folding cartons can transfer to the food-contact side via roll rewinding or sheet stacking (set-off migration). Evidlane verifies that printers use low-migration, low-odor inks complying with EuPIA Exclusion Policy and Nestlé/Swiss Ordinance lists, requiring migration cell extraction data when no functional barrier exists.

Q12.How does the platform handle Food Contact Notifications (FCN) filed with the US FDA?

When a packaging resin, slip agent, antioxidant, or barrier additive is approved via FDA Food Contact Notification (FCN) rather than a legacy 21 CFR section, the approval is exclusive to the manufacturer named in the notification. Evidlane indexes the FDA Effective Food Contact Substance (FCS) inventory, matching supplier brand names, chemical CAS numbers, and effective FCN numbers to confirm that third-party compounders are licensed distributors of the authorized manufacturer.

Q13.How does Evidlane integrate packaging receiving inspection with quarantine hold workflows?

When a packaging shipment arrives at the production dock, warehouse teams scan pallet barcodes into Evidlane. The platform queries whether the converter CoA is matched to the specific resin lot, verifies active CLG/DoC status, checks physical dimension and barrier metrics (thickness, burst strength, COF, pinhole rating), and automatically releases the lot in ERP or flags a digital red tag quarantine hold if compliance documents have expired.
Automate Packaging Compliance Today

Eliminate Food Contact Safety Blind Spots & Accelerate Supplier Approvals

Join leading food processors and innovative packaging converters who trust Evidlane to automate Letters of Guarantee, verify PFAS bans, enforce migration limits, and pass BRCGS & SQF audits with zero findings.

No Long-Term ContractsFull 21 CFR 174-178 & EU 10/2011 SupportSOC 2 Type II Certified Cloud